Retaliation Attorney Orange County
Retaliation Attorney Orange County, Often when an employee calls attention to certain legal activities and or they belong to a protected class, they leave themselves venerable to possible retaliation from the employer. So what does this exactly mean? For example, if an employee reports a safety violation to an outside group or they are a witness in a sexual harassment investigation and they are fired, that may be a situation where employment retaliation could be proved and therefore the termination would be considered as wrongful. Most employees are not fully informed of all of their employee rights and are fired for an illegal reason yet never see justice served on their behalf. Retaliation Claim Attorney that represent employees against their employers are the type of attorney that an employee who has a suspicion that they were fired for an illegal reason should consult with in determining whether or not they have a case.
Retaliation Attorney Orange County
In Southern California, Stevens and McMillan are one of the few City retaliation attorneys who offer free consultations. The attorneys at this office take cases based on contingency which means that they take cases free of initial service fees and do not request any compensation unless they settle the case or win a case at trial. This ensures that the client will not be taken advantage of and be charged for a service that did not benefit them like some “by the hour” services do. It is advised to seek legal aid at once for these types of issues have a statute of limitations.
Did you know that there are many ways an employer can harass and retaliate against employees who quit or resign after a resignation?
Employees could go to work in a perfect world knowing that they won’t be treated unfairly by their superiors or employers. We don’t live in a perfect universe. Employees are often subject to horrific behavior and conditions. Fortunately, there are employment laws that allow employees to sue their employers if they inflict unlawful treatment or permit it to continue. Sometimes, employees are placed in situations where they complain about their mistreatment and are punished. This is called retaliation. The employer may not fire the employee if they retaliate.
Often, however, the employer exposes employees to work conditions so difficult that they are forced to leave. Is it possible for the employer to not be held responsible if the employee isn’t terminated directly by the employer? Retaliation and constructive dismissal are two common claims that can be used to sabotage an employee’s career. However, just because the employee leaves doesn’t make the employer liable. An employee can bring a claim to constructive discharge if the circumstances are so extreme that no one can tolerate the work conditions. This is equivalent to a claim of wrongful termination.
The ways that an employer might retaliate and harass you after your resignation or quitting
- Harassment can result in unjust treatment and even the need to resign
- Termination threats can lead to retaliation and resignation
- A request for impossible might be an act of retaliation. It could lead to a forced resignation
You can find more information at:
- Sexual harassment could lead to unjust treatment and even force you to resign
What is considered “intolerable?” A claim for constructive discharge against an employer by an employee would have to prove that the work environment was too difficult. Max, for example, worked as a customer service representative at an internet service provider. His divorced supervisor Debbie took it upon her to sexually harass Max. She would rub against him in the copy room as she passed and then send him nude photos via email. Debbie also made comments about Max’s buttocks to his colleagues, making Max a target for teasing.
Despite Max complaining to HR multiple times, Debbie continued her aggressive behavior towards Max for the next four months. Max quit his job after feeling hopeless and experiencing extreme anxiety. Max could be able to file a claim for both sexual harassment and constructive discharge. This is because Max was subject to ongoing sexual harassment. A reasonable employee in Max’s position would feel the need to resign. His claims for constructive discharge and sexual harassment may be strengthened by the fact that he reported the harassment to HR, but it continued.
Let’s look at Max’s situation once more. After he complained about HR, Max was demoted to a lower-paying job in his department. However, this new position kept him under the watchful eye of Debbie. These additional facts suggest that Max could also be able to file a retaliation lawsuit. Max could also claim retaliation based on HR’s response regarding his sexual harassment complaint. HR might claim that they moved Max to another position to address his concerns. However, the fact that he was still under the control of his harasser didn’t resolve the problem. Max was also “transferred” to a lower-level position, and this happened after Max complained. This all amounts to Max being punished by HR. Max should contact an Employment Lawyer to discuss the multiple claims against him.
2. Termination threats can lead to retaliation or resignation
A hostile, aggressive, and harsh leader could also be an example of inhospitable working conditions. A situation like this could be aggravating if an employee who was subject to the abuse made a complaint and no action was taken to remedy the problem. This type of situation is considered unacceptable and could lead to an employee being forced to resign. If the employee was threatened with termination and complained to HR or another supervisor, they may be able to file a retaliation claim. To discuss details of a potential case, an Employment Lawyer would be helpful to any employee who has gone through similar events.
3. A request for impossible might be an act of retaliation by an employer and could lead to a forced resignation
Sometimes, an employee might find themselves in a position where the supervisor or employer gives them orders to do certain tasks they know are impossible. Why would an employer want to make their employee fail by torturing them? Employers may try to hide their true intentions to make the employee quit. An employer might want their employee to leave if they complain about illegal pay practices or a hostile work environment. Or, perhaps, they were discriminating against an employee because of their protected class.
This is all to be considered. Let’s say an employee takes a protected leave that his employer doesn’t like and wants to terminate him. An employer might threaten the employee’s job by asking him to obtain certain certifications or training related to his job. The certifications may not be required to perform the duties or the employee cannot attend the training without being absent from work. The employer may be actively trying to make the employee resign, by making him work in unacceptable conditions. The employer’s first actions in giving the employee the task to obtain the fake certification could be considered retaliatory for the employee who is on medical leave.
Employers and supervisors continue to victimize employees. A retaliation attorney is required to represent these employees. While constructive discharge and retaliation can have many negative effects on an employee’s career, a strong legal team may be able to help them with certain remedies under California’s employment laws.
Retaliation Attorney Orange County, CA
What is rehabilitation act?
The Americans with Disability Act (ADA), is something you have probably heard of. However, perhaps you don’t know the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 which served a similar purpose. It was the model for the ADA of 90. The Rehabilitation Act was the first attempt by Congress to protect and help people with disabilities. The Rehabilitation Act was designed to allow people with disabilities to continue working and have the opportunity to live independently. Federal law prohibits discrimination based on disability in federal programs, programs that receive federal financial aid, federal employment, which also includes federal contractors. Individuals with disabilities are entitled to the same rights as people without disabilities under the Rehabilitation Act.
- Certain entities require affirmative action
Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act requires that employers who have federal subcontracts or contracts exceeding $10,000 must take affirmative actions in their employment practices. This includes hiring, retaining, and promoting qualified persons with disabilities. This provision is handled by the Department of Labor. Section 501 also requires federal agencies to take part in affirmative actions. These efforts could include mentoring, training programs, outreach, mentoring, and management education, among others. Affirmative action aims to increase equal employment opportunities and eradicate discrimination based upon disability. In this context, affirmative action does not refer only to quotas.
What is affirmative action for people with disabilities? Unemployed people are disproportionately those who are both working-age and have a disability. Many of these individuals have diverse skills and perspectives that can be used to promote creativity and workplace improvement. Customers with disabilities are more inclined to do business with companies that treat them with dignity.
What are the steps required to implement an affirmative-action plan in a company? An employer has several options when it comes to implementing an affirmative action program for people with disabilities. First, an employer should assign a company representative to oversee the implementation of affirmative actions. Next, the employer should make available an equal opportunity policy statement. The employer should also review its personnel policies to ensure that people with disabilities are considered for training and vacancies. Individuals with disabilities mustn’t be stereotyped so they can’t be denied the opportunity to apply for all jobs. The employer should review job qualifications and ensure they are relevant to the job’s essential functions. It is also important to make reasonable accommodations for those who are not qualified to do a job. This could include making existing facilities accessible and making changes to work schedules. Getting new equipment or changing policies. Employers must create and enforce policies that prohibit discriminatory harassment of people with disabilities at work.
Employers should also take four important steps. The first is to use appropriate outreach and recruitment activities. Employers can either participate in work-study programs that are specialized in training or educating people with disabilities, or they can arrange for job applicant referrals to state vocational rehabilitation agencies. Employers should instruct employees on how to adhere to affirmative action policies. Employers should also create methods to communicate information about affirmative action policies. This will ensure that employees cooperate. Employers should also create and use an auditing and reporting system to measure the effectiveness of their affirmative action programs. Employers should immediately correct any deficiencies found.
2. Federal agencies need access to information technology
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act sets out the requirements for electronic or information technology associated with the federal government. This section requires that this technology be accessible to persons with disabilities. This includes employees and members of the public. What does accessible information technology mean? It means that information technology systems can be used in many ways and users do not need to have one specific ability of sense. A system that produces only auditory output might be difficult to access for people with hearing impairments. This provision would be more compatible with a better system that produces both visual and auditory output. Another option available is to assist in the form of accessibility-related software (e.g. Captions on a video or additional devices for people who might require it.
- Discrimination based on disability is the same as the ADA.
Although it can be difficult to determine what constitutes a disability and thereby employment discrimination based upon disability, understanding your rights under the ADA will ensure that you don’t have to worry about the Rehabilitation Act. In short, both laws define a person with a disability as someone who has significant impairment in at least one major activity or has a history of such impairment. To be protected against discrimination, an individual with a disability must be qualified. This means that they meet the job-related requirements of the job they are applying for. The individual must be able and able to perform essential job functions, though they may be eligible for reasonable accommodations.
Contact a retaliation attorney if you feel you have been discriminated against at work due to your disability.
Call NOW toll free at (800) 738-3353 for a FREE CONSULTATION with NO RECOVERY – NO FEE (No Up-front Costs, Fees or Charges) if you feel like your rights may have been violated.
Contact via email
Toll-Free (800) 738-3353
Monday – Friday 9:00am to 5:00pm